The New Canon focuses on
great works of fiction
published since 1985.  These
books represent the finest
literature of the current era,
and are gaining recognition as
the new classics of our time. In
this installment of
The New
, Ted Gioia reviews
by Ian McEwan.
by Ian McEwan

Reviewed by Ted Gioia

There were so many ways Ian McEwan’s novel Atonement might
have gone wrong.  If book critics were like Olympic diving judges
and factored in “degree of difficulty,” they would treat McEwan’s
story line as if it were a back-flying two-and-a-half somersault. If
this were NASCAR, fans would be waiting
for the first big crash.

How do you get all this stuff to cohere in a
single volume?  After all, here is a book
that leaves the starting-gate as a Jane
Austen country manor romance and
crosses the finish line as a post-modern
meta-fiction.  Along the way, we get a
World War II historical piece and a
hyper-realistic account of a nurse’s
life—both of which could stand alone
as novellas—and don’t forget the
“wronged man” crime mystery, or the
steamy scene in the library that would
leave them blushing and breathless at
The Jane Austen Society.

Yes, this book might have collapsed under its own weight and the
dizzying range of effects that  McEwan attempts to incorporate in its
pages.  But it doesn't fail, it succeeds stunningly, despite the mid-air
spins and back-flips.  The author is in total control—as, indeed, he
needs to be to pull off his plan.  This book starts out solidly, and just
gets better and better. At every twist and turn in the plot (and,
heaven knows, there are plenty of them), McEwan delivers the
goods. Yet he also manages to hold the biggest surprise in his back
pocket for the very end of the novel.

McEwan has demonstrated in other settings his preference for
clever and convoluted plots. Just check out the double zinger at the
end of
Amsterdam or the turnabout at the conclusion of Saturday.
Not many serious authors these days will dare build these
Dickensian structures.  We all know about British understatement,
but even the Yanks are quite comfortable with plots that never
resolve, with books that end with a ugly
phlatttt!!!—leaving the
reader wondering whether the remaining chapters got left out by
mistake. Not with Ian McEwan. He believes that a story, like a game
of chess, should move from opening to mid-game to end-game to a
clear and satisfying resolution. And nowhere is this demonstrated
with more virtuosity than in

But the real draw to this book is not the complex story line, but
rather McEwan’s sheer mastery of the narrative.  At every phase of
Atonement, McEwan tests his powers and demonstrates his
unflagging skill—at setting a scene, drawing it out with the right
degree of description and detail, highlighting the telling incident
within the incident, setting the balance between the physical and
psychological aspects at hand . . . in short, getting everything just

You can’t teach this at a creative writing program or summer camp
for aspiring littérateurs.  Certainly McEwan works diligently and has
mastered his craft, but he also possesses an instinct for what works
and what doesn’t.  For example, much has been made of McEwan
borrowing from Lucilla Andrews’s memoirs of her time as a nurse in
a London hospital during World War II.  The charges were
overblown, and McEwan, for his part, had been open in citing this
source for his book long before the press picked up on it.  Yet the
connection is all the more revealing of this novelist’s skill.  He
understood exactly which tiny details and descriptions from
Andrews’ book could serve as building blocks for the high drama of
Atonement.  In his hands, a nurse’s day-to-day responsibilities take
on a vivid intensity that almost matches the battlefield sequence at
the center of his novel.

Ah, the battlefield section . . . But no, not really a
description in any conventional sense of the term—since there is
field than battle here.  In another daring move, McEwan
leaves out almost all of the fighting from his World War II interlude,
and instead focuses on the retreat and evacuation from Dunkirk.  
This was that tragic moment when "the whole root, the core, and
brain of the British Army," as Winston Churchill described it, were
left stranded and exposed on the coast while waiting for their rescue.
Hundreds of thousands of men waiting . . . and waiting . . . and
waiting.  No, this is not your usual subject for a spirited war story.
Yet McEwan takes this low point in the unfolding of World War II
and builds it into one of the most remarkable pieces of historical
fiction of recent memory.

By this point in
Atonement we are about as far away from the Jane
Austen-esque opening as imaginable.  Yet McEwan surprisingly,
determinedly, works his way back, creating a novel that eventually
returns full circle to its opening pages.  But, as fiction often teaches
us, the innocent past can never really be recaptured.  And McEwan’s
provocative new twist on this truism gives
Atonement an
emotionally shattering conclusion.  In a book that has already
achieved such high points, only the grandest of endings could cap it
off appropriately.  McEwan pulls out all the stops here, and rolls the
dice, saving his riskiest move for last. But as they say, bet
and win.
And in
Atonement, Ian McEwan does just that.
The New Canon
The Best in Fiction Since 1985
The New Canon

Home Page

Gabriel García Márquez:
Love in the Time of Cholera

David Foster Wallace:
Infinite Jest

Margaret Atwood:
The Handmaid's Tale

Toni Morrison:

Jonathan Franzen:
The Corrections

Don DeLillo:

Zadie Smith:
White Teeth

Roberto Bolaño:

Mark Z. Danielewski:
House of Leaves

Cormac McCarthy:
Blood Meridian

Philip Roth:
American Pastoral

Jonathan Lethem:
The Fortress of S0litude

Haruki Murakami:
Kafka on the Shore

Edward P. Jones:
The Known  World

Ian McEwan:

Michael Chabon:
The Amazing Adventures of
Kavalier & Clay

Philip Roth:
The Human Stain

Mario Vargas Llosa:
The Feast of the Goat

Marilynne Robinson:

David Mitchell:
Cloud Atlas

José Saramago:

Jennifer Egan:
A Visit from the Good Sqad

W. G. Sebald:

Jeffrey Eugenides
The Marriage Plot

Donna Tartt:
The Secret History

Michael Ondaatje:
The English Patient

Saul Bellow:

A.S. Byatt:

Umberto Eco:
Foucault's Pendulum

Cormac McCarthy:
The Road

David Foster Wallace:
The Pale King

J.K. Rowling:
Harry Potter and the
Sorcerer's Stone

Arundhati Roy:
The God of Small Things

Roberto Bolaño:
The Savage Detectives

Paul Auster:
The New York Trilogy

Per Petterson:
Out Stealing Horses

Ann Patchett:
Bel Canto

Ben Okri:
The Famished Road

Joseph O'Neill:

Haruki Murakami:
The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle

Marisha Pessl:
Special Topics in Calamity

Jonathan Franzen:

Colm Tóibín:
The Master

Denis Johnson:
Tree of Smoke

Richard Russo:
Empire Falls

Alice Munro:

Martin Amis:
London Fields

Mark Haddon:
The Curious Incident of the
Dog in the Night-Time

John Banville:
The Sea

Chuck Palahniuk
Fight Club

Jeffrey Eugenides:

Junot Diaz:
The Brief Wondrous Life of
Oscar Wao

Aravind Adiga:
The White Tiger

Tim O'Brien:
The Things They Carried

Irvine Welsh

Tobias Wolff:
Old School

Tim Winton:

David Foster Wallace:

Oscar Hijuelos:
The Mambo Kings Play
Songs of Love

More to come

Recommended Links:

Great Books Guide
Conceptual Fiction
Postmodern Mystery
Fractious Fiction
Ted Gioia's personal web site
Ted Gioia on Twitter

American Fiction Notes
LA Review of Books
The Big Read
Critical Mass
The Elegant Variation
Dana Gioia
The Literary Saloon
The Millions
The Misread City
Page Views

Disclosure note: Writers on this site and its
sister sites may receive promotional copies of
works under review.